To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HSK16149 Capsule in Chinese Patients With Herpetic Neuralgia

Phase
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
Investigate the efficacy and safety of HSK16149 capsules in Chinese herpetic Neuralgia following 4 weeks treatment in comparison to pregabalin.
Short title
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HSK16149 Capsule in Chinese Patients With Herpetic Neuralgia
Official title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy , Pregaballin-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HSK16149 Capsules in Chinese Patients With Herpetic Neuralgia

Control arm
Active comparator
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Actual participants
Participants
Participant count basis
Protocol amendments
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Randomised
Model
Parallel groups
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double masking
Masked roles
Participants, Investigators
Sources for study design

  1. Compare the change from baseline in Numeric Rating Scales(NRS )between HSK16149 and pregabalin at week 4

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 4

    Numeric Rating Scales(NRS )was a 11-point numeric rating scale ( 0\[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\]

  1. Compare the response rate between HSK16149 and pregabalin at week 4 (Proportion of subjects whose NRS decreased by ≥30% and≥ 50% from baseline )

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 4

  2. Compare the change from baseline in VAS between HSK16149 and pregabalin at week 4

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 4

    VAS, in which the participant rates pain on a 100 mm-long horizontal line, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain

  3. Compare the change from baseline in DSIS between HSK16149 and pregabalin at week 4

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 4

    The sleep interference scores on a scale of 0-10, where 0 = pain did not interfere with sleep to 10 = pain completely interfered with sleep.

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

  • Signed informed consent;
  • Males or females aged 18 years and older ;
  • Patients must have herpetic neuralgia;
  • At Screening, pain scale (VAS) of ≥ 40 mm;
  • At Screening, pain scale (NRS) of ≥ 4.

  • Patients have pain present for more than 1 months after the healing of the herpes zoster skin rash;
  • AST/ALT > 2 × upper limit of normal (ULN), or TBIL≥1.5 × ULN;
  • Serum Creatine > 176μmol/L;
  • Any active infections at screening;
  • History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products or their excipients, pregabalin or related compounds;
  • Participated in another clinical study within 30 days prior to screening;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding at screening ;
  • Other conditions unlikely to participate in this trial.
Sources for eligibility

  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan, China
Sources for sites

Related records

Drugs (2)

Lead sponsors (1)

Targets (26)