Study Exploring the Supportive Effect of Acarbose in Weight Management

Phase
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
Empros Pharma AB
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind study in participants with overweight or obesity in which the effect of acarbose and the impact of dose on efficacy, safety and tolerability is investigated by comparing the EMP16 combination product with modified release (MR) orlistat, orlistat in its conventional dosage form and placebo.
Short title
Study Exploring the Supportive Effect of Acarbose in Weight Management
Official title
A 26-week, Double-blind, Randomized Study in Participants With Overweight or Obesity Investigating the Added Contribution of Acarbose in EMP16 on Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability

Control arm
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Participants
Participant count basis
Planned participants
Protocol amendments
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
Empros Pharma AB
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Randomised
Model
Parallel groups
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple masking
Masking description
This is a double-blind study, and the allocation of treatments will not be disclosed until clean file has been declared and the database has been locked.
Masked roles
Participants, Care providers, Investigators, Outcome assessors
Sources for study design

  1. Relative (%) change from baseline in body weight at week 26

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  2. Proportion of participants with ≥5% decrease in body weight at week 26 [Please note: This is an FDA required outcome, cannot use "change"]

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  1. Relative (%) change from baseline in body weight at week 26 (secondary and exploratory comparisons)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  2. Proportion of participants with ≥5% (secondary and exploratory comparisons) and ≥10% (all comparisons) decrease in body weight at week 18 and week 26

    Timeframe: Baseline, week 18 and 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  3. Absolute change from baseline in body weight at week 26

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  4. Relative (%) change from baseline in body weight during the 26-weeks treatment period

    Timeframe: Baseline to week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  5. Absolute change from baseline in body weight during the 26-weeks treatment period

    Timeframe: Baseline to week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  6. Absolute change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) measured as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  7. Absolute change from baseline in waist circumference

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  8. Absolute change from baseline in sagittal diameter

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  9. Absolute change from baseline in percentage body fat

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  10. Absolute change from baseline in Quality of life as measured by the questionnaire Rand-36 (9 different domains)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  11. Absolute change from baseline in Quality of life as measured by the questionnaire EQ-5D-5L (measured as one summative value)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  12. Absolute change from baseline in self reported meal pattern. Short questionnaire where points are depending on adherence to the Nordic Nutrition recommendations

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints.

  13. Absolute change from baseline in self reported sleep, where higher points are given for good sleep duration and good sleep quality

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  14. Absolute change from baseline in self reported physical activity, where higher points are given for longer duration of moderate and intense physical activity

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  15. Absolute change from baseline in fasting hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  16. Absolute change from baseline in fasting glucose

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  17. Absolute change from baseline in fasting insulin

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  18. Absolute change from baseline in fasting total cholesterol

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  19. Absolute change from baseline in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  20. Absolute change from baseline in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  21. Absolute change from baseline in fasting triglycerides (TGs)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  22. Absolute change from baseline in fasting Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  23. Absolute change from baseline in fasting Apolipoprotein B (ApoB)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  24. Absolute change from baseline in fasting high sensitivity C-reacting protein (hs-CRP)

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

  25. Absolute change from baseline in fasting albumin

    Timeframe: Baseline and week 26

    Efficacy endpoints

And 8 more, listed on the interactive page.

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

  1. Willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the study.
  2. Males or females (sex distribution 50:50, preferably ±5%) aged ≥18 years.
  3. BMI ≥ 30 or ≥ 27 kg/m² in the presence of other risk factors based on participant interview e.g., hypertension (either or not treated with antihypertensive agents), glucose dysregulation (defined as elevated fasting glucose ≥6.1 mmol/L or HbA1c >42mmol/mol), Type 2 Ddabetes that is treated with lifestyle changes (no medication allowed), and/or dyslipidemia (either or not treated with antihyperlipidemic agents). If indicated, plasma/serum total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and/or TGs can be measured to verify eligibility as judged by the Investigator.
  4. No clinically significant abnormalities regarding physical examination, vital signs, ECG, and laboratory values at the time of the screening visit, as judged by the Investigator.
  5. Adequate renal function: creatinine <1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
  6. Adequate hepatic function: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase <2.5 times upper level of normal (ULN) and bilirubin <1.5 times ULN.

  1. Weight unstable (≥ 5% reported change during the previous 3 months) preceding screening and randomization.

  2. Subjects who are pregnant, who are currently breastfeeding, who intend to become pregnant within the period of the study, or who gave birth within the 6 months preceding the screening visit.

  3. Type 2 diabetes treated with medication.

  4. History or presence of any clinically significant disease, disorder, or history of surgery which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, or influence the results or the participant's ability to participate in the study including but not limited to:

    • GI problems/diseases, e.g., diseases that affect intestinal absorption and peristalsis such as inflammatory bowel diseases, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and Hirschsprung's disease
    • Cholestasis
    • Chronical malabsorption syndrome
    • Severe allergic, cardiac, or hepatic disease
    • Previous GI surgery that might influence GI function significantly, such as previous bariatric surgery, and previous gallbladder surgery as judged by the investigator.

    Potential participants with well-treated chronic diseases (e.g., celiac disease and lactose intolerance) may be included in the study at the discretion of the Investigator.

  5. Significant clinical illness within the preceding 2 weeks of the first administration of IMP at the discretion of the Investigator.

  6. Any significant medical/surgical procedure or trauma within 4 weeks of the first administration of IMP at the discretion of the Investigator.

  7. Any planned major surgery within the duration of the study.

  8. Any use of drugs altering glucose metabolism and drugs used for diabetes (A10A and A10B) or drugs that are affected by, or that affect, orlistat and acarbose, within 2 weeks prior to the first administration of IMP.

  9. Regular use of prescribed or non-prescribed medication within 2 weeks prior to the first administration of IMP as judged by the Investigator. Patients who are on stable treatment with anti-depressants (e.g., selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, SSRI) for at least 2 months can be included at the discretion of the Investigator.

  10. Untreated high blood pressure (systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg at the screening visit).

  11. Known hypersensitivity to any of the test substances.

  12. Malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of in situ removal of basal cell carcinoma.

  13. Excessive intake of alcohol, as judged by the Investigator.

  14. Current or history of alcohol abuse and/or use of anabolic steroids or drugs of abuse.

  15. Positive screen for drugs of abuse, or positive screen for alcohol, at the screening visit (Visit 1).

  16. Any positive result at the screening visit (Visit 1) for serum hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

  17. Plasma donation within 1 month of the screening visit (Visit 1) or any blood donation (or corresponding blood loss) during the 3 months prior to the screening visit.

  18. Administration of another new chemical entity (defined as a compound which has not been approved for marketing) or has participated in any other clinical study that included drug treatment within 3 months of the first administration of IMP in this study. Participants consented and screened but not dosed in previous studies are not excluded.

  19. Investigator considers the potential participant unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions, and requirements.

Sources for eligibility

  • CTC EbbeparkLinköping, Sweden
  • CTC KarolinskaSolna, Sweden
  • Clinical Trial Consultants (CTC)Uppsala, Sweden
Sources for sites

Other registry identifiers

  • 2022-003320-40
Sources for references

Related records

Drugs (4)

Collaborators (1)

Lead sponsors (1)

Conditions (1)

Targets (6)