A Study of Rilvegostomig or Durvalumab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer (ARTEMIDE-Biliary02)

Phase
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig with gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. durvalumab with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first line treatment for patients with advanced BTC.
Short title
A Study of Rilvegostomig or Durvalumab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer (ARTEMIDE-Biliary02)
Official title
Phase III, Randomized, Open-label, Global, Multicenter Study of Rilvegostomig or Durvalumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as a First-line Treatment for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (ARTEMIDE-Biliary02)

Control arm
Active comparator
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Participants
Participant count basis
Planned participants
Protocol amendments
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Randomised
Model
Parallel groups
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
No masking
Masking description
Open label
Sources for study design

  1. Overall Survival (OS) in the PDL1 ≥ 1% population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    Overall Survival is defined as time from randomization until the date of death due to any cause.

  1. Overall Survival in the intent to treat (ITT) population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    Overall Survival is defined as time from randomization until the date of death due to any cause.

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the PDL1 ≥ 1% population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization until radiological progression per RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause (in the absence of progression), whichever occurs first.

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the intent to treat (ITT) population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization until radiological progression per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause (in the absence of progression), whichever occurs first.

  4. Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the PDL1 ≥ 1% population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed CR or confirmed PR using RECIST 1.1.

  5. Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the intent to treat (ITT) population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed CR or confirmed PR using RECIST 1.1.

  6. Duration of Response (DoR) in the PDL1 ≥ 1% population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression using RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause (in the absence of progression), whichever occurs first.

  7. Duration of Response (DoR) in the intent to treat (ITT) population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression using RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause (in the absence of progression), whichever occurs first.

  8. Time to Second Progression or death (PFS2) in the PDL1 ≥ 1% population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest of the progression event (following the initial progression event), after the start of the first subsequent therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

  9. Time to Second Progression or death (PFS2) in the intent to treat (ITT) population

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest of the progression event (following the initial progression event), after the start of the first subsequent therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

  10. Assess the safety and tolerability of rilvegostomig in combination with chemotherapy vs durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by the proportion of treated patients with occurrence of AEs and SAEs as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.

  11. Immunogenicity of Rilvegostomig

    Timeframe: approximately 4 years

    Presence of ADA for rilvegostomig (confirmatory results, titres and neutralising antibodies for confirmed positive samples).

  12. PK of rilvegostomig: Lowest observed concentration of study drug before the next dose is administered (Ctrough)

    Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after disease progression

    Lowest observed plasma concentration of the study drug (Ctrough) prior to next dose

  13. PK of rilvegostomig: Maximum plasma concentration of the study drug (Cmax)

    Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after disease progression

    Maximum observed plasma concentration of rilvegostomig

  14. Serum rilvegostomig concentration

    Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after disease progression

    To assess drug exposure (serum concentration) of IV rilvegostomig.

  15. Assess patient reported biliary tract cancer symptoms (pain)

    Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks post disease progression

    Patient reported biliary tract cancer symptoms (pain) will be evaluated by the proportion of randomized patients with maintained or improved pain as assessed by the EORTC Item Library 445 and EORTC Item Library 446 (custom questionnaires that include measures of pain-in back, in stomach area, during the night; min/max values from 1-4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome).

  16. Assess patient reported global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL)

    Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks post disease progression

    Patient reported GHS/QoL will be evaluated by the proportion of randomized patients with maintained or improved GHS/QoL as assessed by the EORTC Item Library 172 (custom questionnaire that includes measures of overall health and overall quality of life; min/max values from 1-7, with higher scores indicating a better outcome).

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Key inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the biliary tract, including intra-hepatic or extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).
  • Unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BTC, previously untreated in the advanced disease setting
  • Known PD-L1 status assessed at a central laboratory using an acceptable tumor sample.
  • Measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria using CT or MRI and is suitable for accurate repeated measurements.
  • ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1 with no deterioration (ie, ECOG PS > 1) over the previous 2 weeks prior to baseline at screening and prior to randomization.
  • Adequate bone marrow and organ function.

Key exclusion Criteria:

  • Ampullary carcinoma
  • Any prior systemic therapy received for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic BTC.
  • Any prior exposure to any other therapy targeting immune-regulatory receptors or mechanisms.
  • Any concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, investigational, biologic, or hormonal therapy for cancer treatment other than those under investigation in this study.
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders requiring chronic treatment with steroids or other immunosuppressive treatment.
  • Active or ongoing interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (of any grade), serious chronic gastrointestinal conditions associated with diarrhea, or active non-infectious skin disease (including any grade rash, urticaria, dermatitis, ulceration, or psoriasis) requiring systemic treatment.
Sources for eligibility

  • Research SiteBirmingham, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SitePhoenix, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteTucson, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteDuarte, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteLos Angeles, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteOrange, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SitePalo Alto, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteAurora, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteHartford, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteNew Haven, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteWashington D.C., United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteWashington D.C., United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteGainesville, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteJacksonville, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteMarietta, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteChicago, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteChicago, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteIndianapolis, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteLouisville, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteLouisville, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteBaltimore, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteAnn Arbor, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteDetroit, United StatesNot yet recruiting
  • Research SiteRochester, United StatesRecruiting
  • Research SiteOmaha, United StatesNot yet recruiting

And 152 more, listed on the interactive page.

Sources for sites

Related records

Drugs (4)

Lead sponsors (1)

Conditions (3)

Targets (15)