A Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa Injection in Participants With Known or Suspected F2- or F3-stage MASH

Phase
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa for participants with known or suspected MASH with fibrosis consistent with stage F2 or F3.
Acronym
Short title
A Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa Injection in Participants With Known or Suspected F2- or F3-stage MASH
Official title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Efimosfermin Alfa in Participants With Known or Suspected F2- or F3-Stage Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) (ZENITH-2)

Control arm
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Participants
Participant count basis
Planned participants
Protocol amendments
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Randomised
Model
Parallel groups
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double masking
Masking description
This is a double blind study.
Masked roles
Participants, Investigators
Sources for study design

  1. Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs by severity

    Timeframe: At Week 52

  2. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation and TEAEs leading to discontinuation by severity

    Timeframe: At Week 52

  3. Number of participants with Grade 3 and Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities

    Timeframe: At Week 52

  1. Absolute Change from Baseline in enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

    The ELF score will be calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers. The ELF score is used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score less than (\<) 9.8: Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \<11.3: Moderate risk of progression and ELF score greater than or equal to (\>=) 11.3: High risk of progression.

  2. Percent Change from Baseline in ELF score

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

    The ELF score will be calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers. The ELF score is used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \<9.8: Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \<11.3: Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \>=11.3: High risk of progression.

  3. Number of participants achieving an improvement in ELF score greater than equal to 0.5

    Timeframe: At Week 52

    The ELF score will be calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers. The ELF score is used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score \<9.8: Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to \<11.3: Moderate risk of progression and ELF score \>=11.3: High risk of progression.

  4. Absolute Change from Baseline in vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)- liver stiffness measurement (LSM) scores

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  5. Percent Change from Baseline in VCTE- LSM scores

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  6. Number of participants achieving a change from Baseline in VCTE-LSM >=30 percentage (%)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  7. Absolute Change from Baseline in magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) scores in the subset of participants

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

    MRE is a non-invasive imaging technique that combine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning with low-frequency mechanical vibrations to measure the stiffness of liver. MRE scores \<2.5 is normal, 2.5 - 3.0 Normal or inflammation, 3.0 - 3.5 Stage 1-2 fibrosis, 3.5 - 4.0 Stage 2-3 fibrosis, 4.0 - 5.0 Stage 3-4 fibrosis and \> 5.0 Stage 4 fibrosis.

  8. Percent Change from Baseline in the subset of participants with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) scores

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

    MRE is a non-invasive imaging technique that combine MRI scanning with low-frequency mechanical vibrations to measure the stiffness of liver. MRE scores \<2.5 is normal, 2.5 - 3.0 Normal or inflammation, 3.0 - 3.5 Stage 1-2 fibrosis, 3.5 - 4.0 Stage 2-3 fibrosis, 4.0 - 5.0 Stage 3-4 fibrosis and \> 5.0 Stage 4 fibrosis.

  9. Absolute Change from Baseline in hepatic fat fraction (HFF) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

    HFF is the percentage of fat in the liver measured by MRI proton density fat fraction technique, which ranges from 0-75%. Greater than 5% is considered extra fat in the liver.

  10. Percent Change from Baseline in HFF by MRI-PDFF

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

    HFF is the percentage of fat in the liver measured by MRI proton density fat fraction technique, which ranges from 0-75%. Greater than 5% is considered extra fat in the liver.

  11. Absolute Change from Baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (International units per liter)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  12. Absolute Change from Baseline in ALT and AST ratio (ALT/AST)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  13. Percent Change from Baseline in ALT and AST (International units per liter)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  14. Percent Change from Baseline in ALT and AST ratio (ALT/AST)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  15. Number of participants achieving ALT and HFF normalization

    Timeframe: At Week 52

  16. Number of participants achieving HFF less than equal to (<=) 5%

    Timeframe: At Week 52

    HFF is the percentage of fat in the liver measured by MRI proton density fat fraction technique, which ranges from 0-75%. Less than or equal to 5% is considered normal (no significant fatty infiltration (steatosis) in the liver.

  17. Change from Baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  18. Change from Baseline in body weight for all participants(kilograms)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  19. Change from Baseline in fasting total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)- cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides (Millimoles per liter)

    Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52

  20. Number of Participants with antidrug and anti-fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) antibodies (ADA) at Week 52

    Timeframe: At Week 52

  21. Serum drug Concentration of efimosfermin alfa

    Timeframe: Up to Week 52

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

  • Able and willing to understand and sign a written informed consent form (ICF) that must be obtained prior to the initiation of study procedures
  • Age >=18 through <=75 years at enrolment
  • History or presence of 2 or more of the 5 components of metabolic syndrome per American Heart Association definition
  • History or presence of known or suspected MASH with evidence of fibrosis

  • ALT or AST >=5 × upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Total bilirubin (BILI) >=1.3 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL). Individuals with documented Gilbert's syndrome may be enrolled if they experienced an isolated increase in total BILI of >=1.3 mg/dL and direct BILI is <=20% of total BILI; otherwise, the individual will be excluded.
  • Serum albumin <=3.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
  • International normalized ratio (INR) >=1.3 not due to therapeutic anticoagulation. Individuals receiving chronic anticoagulant treatment with higher INR values may be enrolled at the discretion of the Investigator and Study Medical Monitor.
  • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >=2 × ULN
  • Platelet (PLT) count <140 000 per (/) cubic millimeter (mm^3); individuals with a PLT count between 110,000/mm^3 and 140,000/mm^3 may be enrolled after discussion with the Study Medical Monitor
  • Serum creatinine >=1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance <=60 milliliter (mL)/minute (min)/1.73 square meter by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.
  • Alpha-fetoprotein >=20 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
  • HbA1c >=9.0%
  • Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0 score >=12 unless the score is elevated in the absence of liver dysfunction (eg, Gilbert's syndrome)
  • Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) >=80 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) at Screening
  • Known co-infection with any of the following: a. Human immunodeficiency virus; b. Hepatitis B virus; c. Hepatitis C virus (HCV); d. Hepatitis D virus; or e. Hepatitis E virus.
  • Chronic liver disease from any other cause including, but not limited to, alcoholic liver disease; evidence of portal hypertension; viral hepatitis, or any history or evidence of cirrhosis; or decompensated liver disease such as clinical ascites, bleeding gastroesophageal varices, hepatorenal syndrome, or hepatic encephalopathy prior to Screening or Day 1.
  • Current or history of excessive alcohol intake for >=3 months within the 12-month period prior to Screening
Sources for eligibility

  • GSK Investigational SiteArcadia, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteCovina, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteLos Angeles, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteSan Diego, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteSanta Maria, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteVan Nuys, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteBoynton Beach, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteCape Coral, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteDoral, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteHialeah, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteHomestead, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteInverness, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteJacksonville, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteKissimmee, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteLakeland, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMaitland, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMiami, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMiami, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMiami, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMiami, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMiami, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteMiami Lakes, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteOcala, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SitePalmetto Bay, United StatesRecruiting
  • GSK Investigational SiteSarasota, United StatesRecruiting

And 28 more, listed on the interactive page.

Sources for sites

  • 2025
  • 2025-523674-16
Sources for references

Related records

Drugs (1)

Lead sponsors (1)

Conditions (1)