Study of an Injectable Regimen of GS-3242 With Lenacapavir Compared to Biktarvy in People New to HIV-1 Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
Gilead Sciences
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
The study will have two portions: Phase 2 and Phase 3. Phase 2 will further have 2 parts: Part A and Part B. The goal of Phase 2, Part A is to assess the effectiveness of study drugs GS-3242 plus Lenacapavir (LEN) versus Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF)), in people with HIV-1 (PWH) who are new to treatment. This will be done in Treatment Groups 1, 2 and 3 at Week 35. The goal of Phase 2, Part B is to compare the effectiveness of study drugs, GS-3242 and LEN versus B/F/TAF in Groups 4 and 3 at Week 26. The goal of Phase 3 is to assess the long-term effectiveness of study drug GS-3242 and LEN versus B/F/TAF, at Week 52. The primary objectives of this study are: Phase 2, Part A: To evaluate the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B/F/TAF in treatment-naive people with HIV-1 (PWH) in Treatment Groups 1, 2, and 3 at Week 35. Phase 2, Part B: To evaluate the efficacy of IM GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B/F/TAF in treatment-naive PWH in Treatment Groups 4 and 3 at Week 26. Phase 3: To evaluate the efficacy of IM GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B/F/TAF in treatment-naive PWH at Week 52.
Short title
Study of an Injectable Regimen of GS-3242 With Lenacapavir Compared to Biktarvy in People New to HIV-1 Treatment
Official title
An Operationally Seamless Phase 2/3 Randomized, Open-label, Active-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of an Injectable Regimen of GS-3242 in Combination With Lenacapavir Versus Biktarvy (Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide) in Treatment-Naive People With HIV-1

Control arm
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Participants
Participant count basis
Planned participants
Protocol amendments
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
Gilead Sciences
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Randomised
Model
Parallel groups
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
No masking
Sources for study design

  1. Phase 2: Part A: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 35 as Determined by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Algorithm

    Timeframe: Week 35

  2. Phase 2: Part B: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 26 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot Algorithm

    Timeframe: Week 26

  3. Phase 3: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 52 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot Algorithm

    Timeframe: Week 52

  1. Phase 2: Parts A and B: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot Algorithm

    Timeframe: Week 12

  2. Phase 2: Parts A and B: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 52 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot Algorithm

    Timeframe: Week 52

  3. Phase 2: Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 12

    Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

  4. Phase 2: Part A: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 35

    Timeframe: Baseline, Week 35

  5. Phase 2: Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 52

    Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

  6. Phase 2: Part B: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 26

    Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

  7. Phase 2: Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 12

    Timeframe: From first dose date up to Week 12

  8. Phase 2: Part A: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 35

    Timeframe: Week 35

  9. Phase 2: Part B: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 26

    Timeframe: From first dose date up to Week 26

  10. Phase 2: Parts A and B and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 52

    Timeframe: From first dose date up to Week 52

  11. Phase 2: Part A: Groups 1 and 2: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 18

    Timeframe: Week 18

  12. Phase 2: Part A: Groups 1 and 2: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 35

    Timeframe: Week 35

  13. Phase 2: Part A and Part B: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 52

    Timeframe: Week 52

  14. Phase 2: Part B: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 26

    Timeframe: Week 26

  15. Phase 3: Proportion of Participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 104 as determined by the US FDA snapshot algorithm

    Timeframe: Week 104

  16. Phase 3: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 52

    Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

  17. Phase 3: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 104

    Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

  18. Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 52

    Timeframe: From first dose up to Week 52

  19. Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 104

    Timeframe: From first dose up to Week 104

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) ≥ 500 copies/mL at screening.
  • Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive, except for prior use of oral daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) up to 1 month prior to screening.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior usage of, or exposure to LEN or GS-3242
  • Prior use of any long-acting parenteral ARV therapy (ART) medications such as monoclonal antibodies or broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting HIV-1, injectable cabotegravir (including oral cabotegravir lead-in), or injectable rilpivirine.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Sources for eligibility

  • Lundquist Inst Biomedical Innovation Harbor-UCLATorrance, United StatesRecruiting
  • Yale University; School of Medicine; AIDS ProgramNew Haven, United StatesRecruiting
  • Midway Immunology and Research CenterFt. Pierce, United StatesRecruiting
  • Orlando Immunology Center, PAOrlando, United StatesRecruiting
  • Triple O Research Institute, P.A.West Palm Beach, United StatesRecruiting
  • Emory University Hospital Midtown Infectious Disease ClinicAtlanta, United StatesRecruiting
  • Metro Infectious Disease Consultants, P.L.L.CDecatur, United StatesRecruiting
  • KC care Health CenterKansas City, United StatesRecruiting
  • St Hope Foundation, Inc,Bellaire, United StatesRecruiting
  • Prism Health North TexasDallas, United StatesRecruiting
  • North Texas Infectious Diseases Consultants, PADallas, United StatesRecruiting
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease AssociatesFort Worth, United StatesRecruiting
  • McGill University Health CentreDecarie Montreal, CanadaRecruiting
  • CHU de Québec-Université LavalQuébec, CanadaRecruiting
  • Proyecto ACTURio Piedras, Puerto RicoRecruiting
  • HOPE Clinical ResearchSan Juan, Puerto RicoRecruiting
Sources for sites

Other registry identifiers

  • 2026-526026-40
Sources for references

Related records

Drugs (1)

Lead sponsors (1)