Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Cretostimogene Grenadenorepvec in High-Risk NMIBC

Phase
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
CG Oncology, Inc.
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
This is a Phase 2, Multi-Arm, Multi-Cohort, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cretostimogene Grenadenorepvec in Participants with High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Short title
Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Cretostimogene Grenadenorepvec in High-Risk NMIBC
Official title
A Phase 2, Multi-Arm, Multi-Cohort, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cretostimogene Grenadenorepvec in Participants With High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

Control arm
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Participants
Participant count basis
Planned participants
Protocol amendments
Randomisation ratio
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
CG Oncology, Inc.
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Randomised
Model
Parallel groups
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
No masking
Sources for study design

  1. Cohort A (Arm 1 and 2): Complete response rate

    Timeframe: At 11 and 24 weeks

    Determine the complete response rate at any time following treatment with cretostimogene in participants with BCG-naïve CIS with or without concomitant high-grade Ta or T1 disease at baseline

  2. Cohort A (Arm 3): High- Grade Event-Free Survival

    Timeframe: 48 months

    Determine the High-Grade Event-Free Survival following treatment with cretostimogene in participants with BCG-naïve HG Ta/T1 disease without concomitant CIS at baseline.

  3. Cohort B (Arm 1): Complete response rate

    Timeframe: At 11 and 24 weeks

    Determine the complete response rate at any time following treatment with cretostimogene in participants with BCG-exposed CIS with or without concomitant high-grade Ta or T1 disease at baseline.

  4. Cohort B (Arm 2): High-Grade Event-Free Survival

    Timeframe: 48 months

    Determine the High-Grade Event-Free Survival following treatment with cretostimogene in participants with BCG-exposed high-grade Ta/T1 papillary disease without CIS at baseline.

  5. Cohort CX (Arms 1 and 2): High-Grade Event-Free Survival

    Timeframe: 48 months

    Determine the High-Grade Event-Free Survival following treatment with cretostimogene in participants with BCG-exposed or BCG-unresponsive high-grade NMIBC.

  6. Cohort CX (Arms 1 and 2): Safety

    Timeframe: 48 months

    Determine the safety of concurrent cretostimogene and gemcitabine and sequential cretostimogene and gemcitabine.

  1. Cohort A (Arms 1 and 2): Evaluate cretostimogene instillation methods

    Timeframe: At 11 and 24 weeks

    Evaluate cretostimogene genome and GM-CSF levels, treatment efficacy, and safety by 2 different methods of cretostimogene instillation in participants with pathologically confirmed CIS-containing high-risk NMIBC who are naïve to BCG treatment.

  2. Cohort A (Arm 3): High-Grade Event-Free Survival at 12 months

    Timeframe: At 12 months

    Determine the proportion of participants with BCG-naive papillary-only high-grade NMIBC at baseline who are free from high-grade events at 12 months

  3. Cohort A (Arms 1 and 2) and Cohort B (Arm 1) Duration of response

    Timeframe: 48 months

    Assess duration of response in participants with CIS with or without concomitant HG Ta/T1 disease at baseline

  4. Cohort B (Arm 2) High-Grade Event-Free Survival at 12 months

    Timeframe: At 12 months

    Determine the proportion of participants with BCG-exposed papillary-only high-grade NMIBC at baseline who are free from high-grade events at 12 months

  5. Cohort CX (Arm 1 and 2) Complete response rate

    Timeframe: At 11 and 24 weeks

    Determine the complete response rate at any time following treatment with cretostimogene and gemcitabine in participants with BCG-exposed or BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without concomitant high-grade Ta or T1 disease at baseline.

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Cohort A Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically confirmed BCG-naïve high-risk high-grade NMIBC (i.e., CIS with or without Ta/T1 disease or high-grade Ta/T1 papillary-only disease without CIS) within 90 days of treatment allocation.
  • All visible disease must be resected, and all CIS resected or fulgurated, as feasible within 90 days prior to treatment allocation.
  • Acceptable baseline organ function.

Cohort B Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically confirmed BCG-exposed high-risk high-grade NMIBC (i.e., CIS with or without Ta/T1 disease or high-grade Ta/T1 papillary-only disease without CIS) within 90 days of treatment allocation.
  • All visible disease must be resected, and all CIS resected or fulgurated, as feasible within 90 days prior to treatment allocation.
  • Acceptable baseline organ function.

Cohort CX Inclusion Criteria

  • Pathologically confirmed high-risk high-grade BCG-unresponsive or BCG-exposed NMIBC (i.e., CIS with or without Ta/T1 disease or high-grade Ta/T1 papillary-only disease without CIS) within 90 days of treatment allocation.
  • All visible disease must be resected, and all CIS resected or fulgurated, as feasible within 90 days prior to treatment allocation.
  • Acceptable baseline organ function.

Key Exclusion Criteria (Both Cohorts):

  • Current or past history of muscle-invasive, locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer.
  • High-grade urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract or prostatic urethra within 24 months or T2 in upper tract within 48 months or any history of locally advanced/ nodal or metastatic disease in the upper urinary tract.
  • Significant immunodeficiency.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Cohort CX Only: serial intravesical gemcitabine within 24 months
Sources for eligibility

  • Mayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenix, United StatesRecruiting
  • Arizona Urology SpecialtyTucson, United StatesWithdrawn
  • University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle Rock, United StatesRecruiting
  • Arkansas UrologyLittle Rock, United StatesRecruiting
  • Michael G Oefelein, MD Clinical TrialsBakersfield, United StatesRecruiting
  • Genesis Research (Greater Los Angeles)Los Alamitos, United StatesRecruiting
  • Advanced UrologyLos Angeles, United StatesWithdrawn
  • Urology Center of Southern CaliforniaMurrieta, United StatesRecruiting
  • University of California, IrvineOrange, United StatesRecruiting
  • Om researchSan Diego, United StatesRecruiting
  • University of Southern CaliforniaSan Diego, United StatesRecruiting
  • Genesis Research (Greater Los Angeles)Torrance, United StatesRecruiting
  • Colorado UrologyLakewood, United StatesRecruiting
  • Urology Associates, Lone TreeLone Tree, United StatesRecruiting
  • University of FloridaGainesville, United StatesRecruiting
  • Mayo Clinic FloridaJacksonville, United StatesRecruiting
  • Advanced Urology Institute (Solaris)Largo, United StatesRecruiting
  • Advanced Urology InstituteOxford, United StatesRecruiting
  • Advanced Urology Institute - Tallahassee (Solaris)Tallahassee, United StatesWithdrawn
  • Emory UniversityAtlanta, United StatesRecruiting
  • Associated Urological SpecialistsChicago Ridge, United StatesRecruiting
  • UropartnersGlenview, United StatesRecruiting
  • Urology of Indiana - CarmelCarmel, United StatesRecruiting
  • Urology of Indiana, LLC (US Urology Partners)Greenwood, United StatesRecruiting
  • First Urology, PSCJeffersonville, United StatesRecruiting

And 40 more, listed on the interactive page.

Sources for sites

Related records

Drugs (1)

Lead sponsors (1)

Conditions (1)