A Study Evaluating Efruxifermin in Subjects With Compensated Cirrhosis Due to NASH/MASH
- Summary
- This is a multi-center evaluation of efruxifermin (EFX) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in subjects with compensated cirrhosis due to NASH/MASH.
- Short title
- A Study Evaluating Efruxifermin in Subjects With Compensated Cirrhosis Due to NASH/MASH
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Efruxifermin in Subjects With Compensated Cirrhosis Due to NASH/MASH
- Control arm
- Placebo
- Registry reports results
- Listing at source
- Listed
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Completion date
- 2030-03-01
- First posted
- 2024-07-30
- Registry last updated
- 2026-08-19
- Primary completion date
- 2030-02-01
- Start date
- 2024-09-04
- Participants
- 2,150
- Participant count basis
- Estimated
- Planned participants
- 2,150
- Protocol amendments
- Number of sites
- Data monitoring committee
- Registry sponsor category
- Industry
- Lead sponsor
- Akero Therapeutics, Inc
- Source registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Registry ID
- NCT06528314
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06528314
- Registry record
- Open registry record
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Model
- Parallel groups
- Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Quadruple masking
- Masked roles
- Participants, Care providers, Investigators, Outcome assessors
Time from randomization to the first significant clinical event including disease progression, liver decompensation events, etc.
Timeframe: 5 years
Measured by composite of protocol-specified clinical events
Cohort 1 only: Proportion of subjects with ≥ 1 stage improvement in fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis
Timeframe: 96 Weeks
Based on NASH CRN fibrosis score (scored by a fibrosis score of 0-4, where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis, 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis, 3 = bridging fibrosis, 4 = cirrhosis)
Change from baseline of non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
ELF (scale of 6.7 to 11.3 with higher scores indicative of increased fibrosis)
Change from baseline of non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
Pro-C3 (ug/L)
Change from baseline of non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
Liver stiffness assessed by transient elastography (FibroScan®) (kPa)
Change from baseline of markers of liver injury
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
ALT (U/L) and AST (U/L)
Change from baseline of lipoproteins
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
Total cholesterol (mg/dL), Triglycerides (mg/dL), HDL-C (mg/dL), Non-HDL-C (mg/dL), and LDL-C (mg/dL)
Change from baseline of markers of insulin sensitivity and glycemic control
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
HbA1c (%)
Change from baseline of markers of insulin sensitivity and glycemic control
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
C-Peptide (ng/mL)
Change from baseline of markers of insulin sensitivity and glycemic control
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
Adiponectin (mg/L)
Change from baseline of markers of insulin sensitivity and glycemic control
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
Insulin (mIU/L)
Change from baseline of markers of insulin sensitivity and glycemic control
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
HOMA-IR (≥ 2.5 indicates insulin resistance)
Change from baseline of body weight (kg)
Timeframe: 96 Weeks, 5 Years
Safety and tolerability of EFX through the reporting of extent of exposure (weeks)
Timeframe: From first dose through end of study (up to 5 Years)
Safety and tolerability of EFX through the reporting of adverse events (frequency of events)
Timeframe: From first dose through end of study (up to 5 Years)
Proportion of subjects reporting adverse events
Safety and tolerability of EFX through the reporting of adverse events (severity of events)
Timeframe: From first dose through end of study (up to 5 Years)
Proportion of subjects reporting adverse events
Number of participants with abnormal laboratory tests results, abnormal ECGs, abnormal ultrasounds, abnormal vital sign assessments
Timeframe: From first dose through end of study (up to 5 years)
Cohort 1 only: Proportion of subjects with ≥ 1 stage improvement in fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis
Timeframe: 5 Years
Based on NASH CRN fibrosis score (scored by a fibrosis score of 0-4, where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis, 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis, 3 = bridging fibrosis, 4 = cirrhosis)
Cohort 1 only: Proportion of subjects with ≥ 1 stage improvement in fibrosis
Timeframe: 96 Weeks
Based on NASH CRN fibrosis score (scored by a fibrosis score of 0-4, where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis, 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis, 3 = bridging fibrosis, 4 = cirrhosis)
Cohort 1 only: Proportion of subjects with Resolution of NASH/MASH
Timeframe: 96 Weeks
Based on NAS (scored by 0-1 for steatosis, 0-3 for inflammation, and 0-2 for ballooning)
Cohort 1 only: Proportion of subjects with Resolution of NASH/MASH and a ≥ 1 stage improvement in fibrosis
Timeframe: 96 Weeks
Based on NAS (scored by 0-1 for steatosis, 0-3 for inflammation, and 0-2 for ballooning) and NASH CRN fibrosis score (scored by a fibrosis score of 0-4, where 0 = no fibrosis, 1 = centrilobular pericellular fibrosis, 2 = centrilobular and periportal fibrosis, 3 = bridging fibrosis, 4 = cirrhosis)
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adults, Older adults
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- No
- Cohort 1: Biopsy proven compensated cirrhosis (fibrosis stage 4) due to NASH/MASH and NAS score of >=3 (at least 1 in each category) or evidence of steatosis and 2 current features of metabolic comorbidities
- Cohort 2: Biopsy proven or non-invasively diagnosed compensated cirrhosis (fibrosis stage 4) due to NASH/MASH
- Other causes of liver disease based on medical history and/or liver histology and/or central laboratory results
- Type 1 diabetes or unstable Type 2 diabetes
- Any current or prior history of decompensated liver disease
Other inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.
- Akero Clinical Study SiteBirmingham, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteDothan, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteChandler, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteFlagstaff, United StatesCompleted
- Akero Clinical Study SitePeoria, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteScottsdale, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteTucson, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteTucson, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteTucson, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteTucson, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteConway, United StatesCompleted
- Akero Clinical Study SiteJonesboro, United StatesCompleted
- Akero Clinical Study SiteLittle Rock, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteNorth Little Rock, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteCoronado, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteEscondido, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteFolsom, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteFountain Valley, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteLancaster, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteLong Beach, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteLos Angeles, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteNewport Beach, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteOrange, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SitePasadena, United StatesRecruiting
- Akero Clinical Study SiteRedwood City, United StatesRecruiting
And 304 more, listed on the interactive page.