A Phase 2, Safety and Efficacy of Bemnifosbuvir (BEM) and Ruzasvir (RZR) in Subjects With Chronic HCV

Phase
Recruitment status
Participants
Lead sponsor
Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Start date
Number of sites

Summary
This is an open-label trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of treatment with BEM + RZR in subjects with chronic HCV infection.
Short title
A Phase 2, Safety and Efficacy of Bemnifosbuvir (BEM) and Ruzasvir (RZR) in Subjects With Chronic HCV
Official title
A Phase 2, Open-label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Bemnifosbuvir (BEM) and Ruzasvir (RZR) in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection

Control arm
Registry reports results
Listing at source
Recruitment status
Phase
Study type
Interventional

Completion date
First posted
Registry last updated
Primary completion date
Start date

Actual participants
Participants
Participant count basis
Protocol amendments
Number of sites

Data monitoring committee
Registry sponsor category
Lead sponsor
Atea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Source registry
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
Registry record
Open registry record

Allocation
Not applicable
Model
Single group
Purpose
Treatment
Masking
No masking
Sources for study design

  1. Percentage of Subjects Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)

    Timeframe: Day 1 through 12 weeks after end of treatment

    SVR12 defined as plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation (\<LLOQ) at 12 weeks post-treatment

  1. Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure

    Timeframe: Day 1 through 12 weeks after end of treatment

    Virologic failure defined as a confirmed 1 log10 increase in HCV RNA from post-baseline nadir, or confirmed increase in HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ in any subject who achieved HCV RNA \< LLOQ.

  2. Percentage of Subjects Achieving Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR24)

    Timeframe: Day 1 through 24 weeks after end of treatment

    SVR24 defined as plasma HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation (\<LLOQ) at 24 weeks post-treatment

Sources for outcomes

Sex
All
Age groups
Adults, Older adults
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

  • Male or female subjects between ≥ 18 years of age (or the legal age of consent per local regulations) and ≤ 85 years of age

  • Female subjects of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or to the use of an acceptable effective contraception

  • Females must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and at Day 1 prior to dosing

  • Subjects must be direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-treatment-naïve, defined as never exposed to an approved or experimental DAA for HCV

  • Documented medical history compatible with chronic HCV

  • Liver disease staging assessment as follows:

    • Absence of cirrhosis (F0 to F3)
    • Compensated cirrhosis (F4)

  • Female subject is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV; positive for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Abuse of alcohol and/or illicit drug use that could interfere with adherence to study requirements as judged by the investigator
  • Prior exposure to any HCV DAA
  • Use of other investigational drugs within 30 days of dosing or plans to enroll in another clinical trial of an investigational agent while participating in the present study
  • Subject with known allergy to the study medications or any of their components
  • History or signs of decompensated liver disease: ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or other clinical signs of portal hypertension or hepatic insufficiency
  • Cirrhotic and has a Child-Pugh score >6, corresponding to a Child-Pugh Class B or C
  • History of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or findings suggestive of possible HCC
  • Any other clinically significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject or impact the validity of the study results
Sources for eligibility

  • Atea Study SiteSan Antonio, United States
  • Atea Study SiteManaus, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteSalvador, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteBrasília, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteRio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Atea Study SitePorto Alegre, Brazil
  • Atea Study SitePorto Alegre, Brazil
  • Atea Study SitePorto Velho, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteBoa Vista, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteBotucatu, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteIjuí, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteSão José do Rio Preto, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteSão Paulo, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteSão Paulo, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteSorocaba, Brazil
  • Atea Study SiteVancouver, Canada
  • Atea Study SiteToronto, Canada
  • Atea Study SiteRajkot, India
  • Atea Study SiteSurat, India
  • Atea Study SiteBelagavi, India
  • Atea Study SiteNagpur, India
  • Atea Study SiteKolkata, India
  • Atea Study SiteQuatre Bornes, Mauritius
  • Atea Study SiteChisinau, Moldova
  • Atea Study SiteKarachi, Pakistan

And 26 more, listed on the interactive page.

Sources for sites

Related records

Drugs (2)

Lead sponsors (1)

Conditions (2)